Dr. Hamer on Religious Beliefs

"The cruel way to treat Nature, caused by the major religions of the Old Testament, has led to the worst natural disaster on Earth."

"These primitive beliefs, which have no compassion for the souls of animals and plants, have brought over 2000 years of endless suffering to the whole planet
and should therefore be overborne."

"Even if our civilised humanity is led to believe that society can be manipulated at will with arbitrary laws and regulations, which has always been the ultimate goal of the so-called major religions (Judaism, Islam, Christianity), the time will soon dawn when we all realise that we have been manoeuvred/tricked into a dogmatic dead end of civilisation that bypasses nature and biological realities to the point of total instinctive-biological folly."

Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer, Vermächtnis einer Neuen Medizin, 1999
Translated by the English translation group

E-mail (June 14, 2024)

Dear Germanische Heilkunde working group,
I am an American of German descent. I am also a practicing Roman Catholic. ... I am saddened to learn that Dr. Hamer had a negative view of the Church and Christianity in general. If I have misunderstood, please correct me. Since Dr. Hamer had a Master's Degree in theology, this does not make sense to me. If you are willing to share, I would very much like to know why this is and what Dr. Hamer's religious beliefs were.
From my perspective, St. Boniface¹ saved, and not enslaved, the German people by converting them to Christianity and helped them stop sacrificing their children to false gods. Also, what did Dr. Hamer believe about the afterlife? I want to support as much of the Germanic as possible without compromising my religious beliefs and I do not wish to attack or offend you in any way. There are too many people who have shamefully slandered Dr. Hamer's good name and I do not want to be one of them. Thank you for your kind understanding. 

Reply of the Working Group

Hello...you are raising important questions and we will gladly answer you in more detail.

Preliminary note:
The Biological Laws of Nature and the many details that Dr Hamer has discovered and researched in a scientific, empirical way are in no way based on religion or faith. This also means that you don't have to believe anything, but can verify it yourself.

Mother Nature has neither beliefs nor ideologies. In living nature, there is no living creature that is guided by ideologies or religious beliefs and thereby claim to be greater and worthier than other living beings. Mother Nature follows the laws of nature and forms a coherent system, a homogeneous whole, a harmonious coexistence of all living beings. It is only human beings who, at some time in history, began to consider themselves superior to other human beings and other living creatures, even describing themselves as the Crowning Glory of God's Creation.

Dr Hamer has never persuaded another person not to believe in God or to choose a different religion. Everyone is free to follow their own religious beliefs, and everyone has to decide and reflect for themselves.

Any religion that ignores the laws of nature is not compatible with life on earth. A society that ignores the Biological Laws of Nature, or rather: a society that is deliberately forced to lead a life that is contrary to these laws of nature, has so far caused the loss of billions and billions of lives (including animals and plants).

As soon as someone has understood that Germanische Heilkunde is scientifically correct, they must consequently ask themselves why, 43 years after Dr Hamer's groundbreaking discovery, the hypotheses of orthodox medicine are still on the agenda and the mandatory "treatment" is still chemotherapy and morphine (unavoidable for children) – which has literally sacrificed billions of human lives (see Dr Hamer's letters, example). Who has the power to prevent the Germanische and to commit this mass murder (quote from Prof. Niemitz, German)?
Once people start to ask themselves this questions, they will also realise that this is not just about medicine or free choice of treatment, but about the suppression of the entire human race, mind control, controlling all aspects of life, even the extermination of living beings (including humans) by all possible means. All of this is pushed through at a political level.

For all peoples, Germanische Heilkunde is the way to a life based on biological principles and the way to a society that lives in harmony with its fellow creatures and respects the laws of nature – at the same time, it is the way to freedom! That is the heart and the central meaning of Germanische Heilkunde.

Regarding the (Roman Catholic,…) Church:
Dr Hamer had written to the Pope several times, here is a quote from a letter (Sept 11, 2016):

"Dear Holy Father Francis, more than a month ago I sent you an open letter with several proposals. Now, after more than 1 month, you did not consider it important enough to reply to me, not even to send me an intermediate reply... I wanted to help you to work together in trying to lessen this cruel mega-crime, which by far tops all previous executions of heretics ..."

Back in 1981, Dr Sigrid Hamer submitted a copy of Dr Hamer's original habilitation thesis to Pope John Paul II via Prof. Ratzinger. Friends of the Germanische also wrote to the Pope and representatives of the Church. However, there was no interest in Germanische Heilkunde or human lives.

Do you know the "Wojtyla Principle"? Please read Dr Hamer's revealing essay (only German).

We would like to ask some questions that you do not need to answer. Please understand that we too do not wish to attack or offend you in any way.
Do you really believe that your own ancestors were such barbaric bastards that they would sacrifice their own children to false (?) gods? Is it allowed to sacrifice children to the right gods? (Aren't our children sacrificed at the altar of orthodox medicine nowadays?) Isn't it always the victorious power that controls historiography? The victors can write (invent) what they want, the vanquished have nothing to say. Basically, we know almost nothing about our Germanic culture or the history of ancient Europe.

Quote from Dr Hamer (Video Mein Studentenmädchen):

„Whilst there was slavery everywhere in Europe – in Rome ¾ were slaves and only ¼ were free people – the Germanians grimly defended their freedom. Arminius won three battles. In 9AD, 15 AD and 16 AD – the last battle against 100,000 Roman legionaries and it was only about freedom. Right? The Germanians didn’t want to become slaves of the Romans. They wanted to remain free and they achieved it. And then they were free for 400 years longer until the church took over.”

What faith or religious beliefs did Dr Hamer embrace?
-> Please watch the interview with Dr Hamer and J. Miklosko. By the way, Miklosko is Catholic.
-> The following article is answering your question about Dr Hamer's thoughts on the afterlife: "Primordial Connection with the Spirit in Nature" and might be of general interest to you.

Finally, we would like to point out that it is possible to search by words (content) on the website. This makes it possible to get in-depth information on a topic that interests you. Please click on the icon in the top menu bar (or left side bar).

Best regards,
Germanische Heilkunde Working Group

1 - Comment:
About Boniface (information from the Internet): "According to the vitae Boniface felled the Donar Oak near the present-day town of Fritzlar in northern Hesse... Lutz von Padberg and others claim that what the vitae leave out is that the action was most likely well-prepared and widely publicized in advance for maximum effect, and that Boniface had little reason to fear for his personal safety since the Frankish fortified settlement of Büraburg (Büraburg castle) was nearby... In order to convince the Chatthi (most of the members of the tribe had not yet converted to Christianity) he tried to prove that the old Germanic Gods were powerless and in 723, protected by Frankish soldiers and in the presence of numerous Chatthi, he had the Donar Oak, which was one of the most important Germanic sanctuaries, felled."

The similarities between the destruction of Germanic culture and other indigenous cultures are obvious. Whoever is in control of military power dominates (religion, law, medicine).
 

E-mail (July 04, 2024) and the Reply of the Working Group

Dear Germanische Heilkunde working group, Thank you for responding to my question regarding religion. I think I understand Dr Hamer’s position a little better now although I disagree. I would like to offer you my humble opinion on this matter. Whether or not you respond is up to you. I will be clear that I am in no way telling you what you can or can’t say or do. As an American I recognize your right to freedom of speech.

ANSWER
Thank you for recognizing our right to freedom of speech as an American. Likewise, as inhabitants of the Eurasian continent, we recognize your right to freedom of speech.

I truly do not understand why Dr Hamer thought that killing animals for food or even ritual sacrifice is somehow cruel or opposed to nature. After all, there are natural carnivores in nature who kill and eat their prey all within the harmony of nature. It cannot be called cruel for a lion to kill because it is just being a lion. Likewise, humans are natural omnivores. Therefore, why would our eating of meat be inherently cruel or against nature?

ANSWER
Regarding "killing animals for food ... opposed to nature": May we ask where you got this information from? Because in the original books of Dr. Hamer and also on the international website of Dr. Hamer there is no such information because, as you have already noticed, it is wrong. Dr Hamer writes about nature's regulatory circuits, which include the fact that every animal is both prey and hunter: See: Verhaltenscode, Biologische Harmonie

Regarding "ritual sacrifice": we can confirm that Dr Hamer and also we consider this practice to be abhorrent and against nature. If someone wants to make a sacrifice to their God because of their faith, then they should sacrifice themselves - and not other living beings that have nothing to do with their faith.

As for ritual sacrifice of animals, I as a Christian recognize that this is no longer necessary because of Christ’s sacrifice. However, I recognize that in the past, God told the Jews to do it not because it was what he actually wanted but because it was better than worshipping creation rather than the creator. As David wrote in the Psalms, it is not ritual sacrifice that pleases God but a contrite heart. The same goes for the God telling Israelites to annihilate the pagan nations. God didn’t really want it but it was the only way to keep them from worshipping idols.

ANSWER
At this point, we recommend that you watch the entire video by Eduard Hodos, especially regarding the definition of idol(s). Because, based on your beliefs, you see pagan gods as idols. And the Jewish religion defines Jesus Christ as an idol (evidence in the video, Israel TV  01:48 and Bulochnik 10:34). So we would like to ask you: How do you know that you are right and that the pagan peoples, i.e. our ancestors, did not have the right to practise the faith that corresponded to their culture and development?

Furthermore, there must be a creator who is greater than Mother Nature because something can’t come from nothing and as Dr Hamer’s discoveries further prove that it’s impossible for nature to be random.

ANSWER
 Dr Hamer does not regard the Creator as greater than Mother Nature and Mother Nature as greater than the Creator. Because the Creator and creation are one.
Why do you think that there has to be a hierarchy?

Therefore if a creator can be objectively shown to exist then why wouldn’t he have the authority to allow ritual sacrifice?

ANSWER
On ritual sacrifice, see above. No further comment.

How is this causing the world’s greatest natural disaster (I’m not sure what disaster that is)? The way I see it, the ones who actually are acting against nature in cruelty are the greedy corporations of the food industry. The way they are raising the animals unnaturally using cages, machines and toxic chemicals are harmful to humans because we are consuming unhealthy meat. For this reason I support organic pasture raised meat.

ANSWER
You ask what natural disaster Dr Hamer is talking about and yet you directly describe it ... such an anti-natural attitude towards our fellow creatures - the animals and plants - has arisen from Mosaic religions, since these religions deny that animals and plants have souls and regard them as "objects, things". You can keep an object in a cage, can't you?

As for the experiments done to animals, I agree with Dr Hamer that since they are unnecessary, they are unethical. The only reason the Church allows experiments is under the assumption that they are necessary. I’m sure that if church leaders understand Dr Hamer’s scientific discoveries, they would be against the experiments too.

ANSWER
The church leaders know about Germanische Heilkunde. You write: "...if church leaders understand Dr Hamer’s scientific discoveries..." We ask you, why a homo sapiens who declares to believe in the true God and to be a mediator between the true God and the "other homo sapiens" is not able to understand Germanische Heilkunde??? Germanische Heilkunde describes how creation is organised (functions) and the representatives of the Creator cannot understand it???

As for Stefan Lanka, you have sufficiently shown that he unjustly slandered Dr Hamer and the vulgar remarks he made are wrong. I also acknowledge that you have provided proof that evil Zionist extremists do in fact exist (although I’m not sure I agree that it’s as widespread as Dr Hamer seemed to think).

ANSWER
At this point, we again recommend the videos by Hodos. In particular, everyone should ask themselves how it can be that "not so widespread evil Zionist extremists" have their branches all over the world. Where did they get the unlimited financial power to do so? 

However, I confess that I agree with Lanka’s comment to Dr Hamer that he should, perhaps, keep his personal opinions separate from his scientific discoveries.

ANSWER
What personal opinions of Dr Hamer do you mean? The opinions about the "not so widespread evil Zionist extremists"? Well, the problem is that they have suppressed the Germanische Heilkunde from the beginning. Do you think Dr Hamer should keep quiet about this? What about freedom of speech? Why are little criminals in jail and the major criminals are untouchable and should even be downplayed as "not so widespread"? Perhaps this is one of the problems of our junk society?

You have said that Germanische Heilkunde is more than just science but I don’t see why the science can’t be separated from Dr Hamer’s personal beliefs about religion and ethics. A lot more people could benefit from The Germanic this way because they wouldn’t be scared off. (I’m not sure if you mean to say by “more than science” that Germanische Heilkunde can truly be called a religion or just that it is like a religion). I know that you say you don’t care whether people accept it, but maybe you should reconsider caring for the benefit of those religious people who could be prevented from dying of cancer and the only thing standing in their way is that they disagree with Dr Hamer’s ethical standards.

ANSWER
Germanische Heilkunde is more than just science, but not because it is a religion. On the contrary, in Germanische Heilkunde you don't have to believe anything, you can verify and understand it without intermediaries. Germanische Heilkunde explains to us how we and the world around us function, and on this basis it shows us that life in our junk society with the beliefs imposed on us is extremely harmful to us as a biological species. It also shows us that we are not only destroying ourselves, but also our environment (animals and plants).

The problem is not Dr. Hamer's words or our words that apparently scare people off but it is their inability to question their own beliefs. However, if people are unable to do this and are not prepared to live their lives biologically or at least try to do so, as far as is possible in our society, then Germanische Heilkunde will not help them when it comes to cancer, because in these cases the NON-BIOLOGICAL course of the disease is practically pre-programmed. And Dr Hamer's or our opinion or words cannot do anything about it. Every person is responsible for their own development.

Again, it’s just my opinion and you can say and do what you want. I know you will always agree with Dr Hamer. And even from a scientific perspective, Dr Hamer was definitely a genius but he was also human and even geniuses can make mistakes. Do you disagree? You don’t like it when others have attempted to “correct” the genius but science is a living thing that is constantly evolving and being updated as Ilsedora Laker pointed out in her open letter to Ewa. If she could respond to Ilsedora’s letter I think it would be helpful for everyone’s understanding. Is it not possible that Dr Hamer’s discoveries are still undeveloped in some areas? Certainly the integrity of Dr Hamer’s work must be kept intact but at the same time, if it is held to dogmatically like religious texts, it cannot be further clarified and developed for the benefit of us all.

ANSWER
Yes, science is a living thing, it is constantly developing. But before you "correct" or "improve" or "further develop" Dr Hamer, you have to KNOW his discovery in all its depth. Unfortunately, at the moment we are only dealing with "Hanswürste" ("buffoons", quote by Dr. Hamer) who are "correcting" or "improving" something that they don't even understand. And they are marketing their "rubbish" under the name Germanische Heilkunde and Dr Hamer. It's all about greed for profit, unfortunately. There is no time to study, gain experience and reflect for years - after all, they need quick money.
Example for a Hanswurst (buffoon), N. Barro: https://germanische-heilkunde-dr-hamer.com/archiv/2009/raeuber-und-verfaelscher-22-06-2009

As it is, The Legacy of the New Medicine is out of print even in German and most people don’t have access to it. To some level, how can you really blame people for wanting to write their own books to try to make sense of it? I’m not saying that they should, but I can understand why they would do so without malicious intent. To them, Germanische Heilkunde is bigger than its discoverer Dr Hamer and the laws of nature themselves cannot truly be copyrighted. Do you plan on reprinting any more of Dr Hamer’s other works (perhaps it’s just due to a lack of funding?)

ANSWER
The Legacy of the New Medicine is available in German. The information you have is wrong. If people would help to publish the books, e.g. in the form of a donation for the GOOD translation of some of Dr Hamer's books (because Amici di Dirk cannot publish just any translation due to the great responsibility), then we would already have more books by Dr Hamer in different languages.
But these people prefer to take advantage of the situation that Dr Hamer is being slandered everywhere and is not granted any right in court, for example by writing their amateurish books in which they "correct" and "improve" Dr Hamer and to profit from it. These books are sold for expensive money, and the poor machine translations of Dr Hamer's books are made available free of charge, thereby causing financial damage to the publisher Amici di Dirk and damage to the scientific content of Germanische Heilkunde. At the same time, these "homo sapiens" hypocritically claim that they only want to contribute to spreading the Germanische Heilkunde. With this hypocrisy, they believe they can clear themselves of any guilt and also encourage other thieves and "improvers" (falsifiers) to distort and abuse Dr Hamer's work.

 I hope I have not offended anyone. I am just asking the tough questions that I am sure many others are asking as well.

ANSWER
We also hope that we do not offend anyone with our words, but only encourage people to reflect.

P.S.

"That changed radically when Islam and Christianity came to dominate. Their contempt for animals put an end to any dialogue with animals and degraded all animals (and plants) to purely commercial products that can be exploited and sold."
As you can see Dr. Hamer cleary states he is AGAINST the commercialization of animals, which confirms he should have been vegan or vegetarian. Please confirm.

ANSWER
Correct, Dr. Hamer and we are against commercialization of animals and against animal testing. It is also up to each individual not to eat food of animal origin due to personal ethical convictions. However, it does not change the fact that "prey and hunter" is something natural; i.e. it is not contrary to nature.
Please do not mix up your own conclusions or ethical/moral convictions with nature and biology and what Dr. Hamer tells us!